<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Avoid Breach Notification - Experior helps PHI Encryption &#187; Windows Server 2003</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.experiordata.com/blog/tag/windows-server-2003/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.experiordata.com/blog</link>
	<description>Encrypt your PHI, and avoid breach notification</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 04:09:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>To BitLocker or to Not BitLocker? &#8211; that&#8217;s a great question!</title>
		<link>http://www.experiordata.com/blog/2009/11/19/to-bitlocker-or-to-not-bitlocker-thats-a-great-question/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experiordata.com/blog/2009/11/19/to-bitlocker-or-to-not-bitlocker-thats-a-great-question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Encyption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BitLocker Drive Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2003]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experiordata.com/blog/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



Image via CrunchBase



BitLocker, Microsoft&#8217;s disk encryption technology that comes with Windows 7 Ultimate, can throw the system admin into a boondogle. Sure it&#8217;s easy to just use what is &#8220;in the box&#8221; and call it a day. However, be prepared for a long&#8230;very long day in getting BitLocker deployed and managed.
..
Microsoft has traditionally added feature [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; display: block;">
<div>
<dl class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 200px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/product/windows"><img title="Image representing Windows as depicted in Crun..." src="http://www.crunchbase.com/assets/images/resized/0002/1545/21545v2-max-450x450.png" alt="Image representing Windows as depicted in Crun..." width="190" height="66" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd zemanta-img-attribution" style="font-size: 0.8em;">Image via <a href="http://www.crunchbase.com">CrunchBase</a></dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<p><a class="zem_slink" title="BitLocker Drive Encryption" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitLocker_Drive_Encryption">BitLocker</a>, <a class="zem_slink" title="Microsoft" rel="homepage" href="http://www.microsoft.com">Microsoft</a>&#8217;s disk encryption technology that comes with Windows 7 Ultimate, can throw the system admin into a boondogle. Sure it&#8217;s easy to just use what is &#8220;in the box&#8221; and call it a day. However, be prepared for a long&#8230;very long day in getting BitLocker deployed and managed.</p>
<p><span style="color: #808080;">..</span></p>
<p>Microsoft has traditionally added feature after feature to their products. But that doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean you have to use them (or actually, should use them). Before we discuss BitLocker think of the last time someone used the e-mail server that comes with Windows <a class="zem_slink" title="Windows Server 2003" rel="homepage" href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/">Server 2003</a> (yes, it really does come with a basic POP3 server). Ok, give up? That&#8217;s probably because most of the corporate world uses Microsoft Exchange. How about using Windows Servers as internet firewalls. Possible? Yes. Practical? No. Microsoft adds these features to help sell the core product. The can say &#8220;well, you don&#8217;t need a mail server. Server 2003 has one built-in&#8221;, even though we all know that the only purpose for it is to use it in some lab.</p>
<div class="zemanta-img zemanta-action-dragged" style="margin: 1em; display: block;">
<div>
<dl class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 125px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Sushiusb.jpg"><img title="A USB flash drive in the shape of a piece of i..." src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/de/Sushiusb.jpg/300px-Sushiusb.jpg" alt="A USB flash drive in the shape of a piece of i..." width="115" height="97" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd zemanta-img-attribution" style="font-size: 0.8em;">Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Sushiusb.jpg">Wikipedia</a></dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<p><span style="color: #888888;">..</span></p>
<p>And here comes BitLocker. Yes, it can encrypt hard drives. Yes, it can encrypt <a class="zem_slink" title="USB flash drive" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_flash_drive">USB flash drives</a>. But before you pay the extra $19.99 per user for your corporate Windows 7 deployment first consider these limitations and facts about how BitLocker is deployed:</p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;">..</span></p>
<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">BIOS must be compatible with <a class="zem_slink" title="Trusted Platform Module" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_Platform_Module">TPM</a> version 1.2 and support USB device boot </span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Requires TPM chip </span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Requires TPM management snap-in configuration to save <a class="zem_slink" title="Encryption" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encryption">encryption key</a> to a USB device </span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">TPM PIN management (help desk must maintain a list of TPM PINs in case user forgets) </span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">No complexity or content rules available for TPM PIN </span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">No single sign-on (TPM PIN not related to AD auth info) </span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Admin rights needed to perform initial encryption </span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Requires management of TPM “owner passwords” </span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Requires you to maintain recovery keys that match Bitlocker keys created on each computer </span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Requires <a class="zem_slink" title="Active Directory" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Directory">Active Directory</a> Schema extensions to be installed on 2003 and 2008 servers (don&#8217;t you love &#8220;extending the schema&#8221;?)<br />
</span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Recovery options require a TPM PIN </span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">No centralized reporting </span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Policies managed by GPOs (because they&#8217;re so easy to manage now)<br />
</span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">No separating of duties – recovery codes stored in AD, propogated to all DCs. </span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">No support for smart cards or tokens at pre-boot (cold boot and firewire-method HD attacks come to mind)<br />
</span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">For USB encryption – recovery keys are not managed centrally – give user ability to “print out” recovery key or store it elsewhere in a file (no key management) </span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">USB encryption -&gt; not possible to write to non-Windows 7 machines once encrypted with Windows 7</span></span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #888888;">..</span></p>
<p>So after all the time you&#8217;ve spent just to get this far you now have an encryption system that is only Windows 7 specific. Are your legacy XP clients encrypted? No. The Macs in the marketing department? No. The Linux devices in development? No. Use a smart card or token at pre-boot? No.  Can you write to USB drives encrypted with Win 7 on non-Win 7 machines? No. Are there separation of duties? Nope.</p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;">..</span></p>
<p>Before rolling out BitLocker take into consideration not only the software limitations but also the time involved to learn the infrastructure needed to deploy it properly. Create a lab with several PCs and a server and  do real-world testing and see for yourself. BitLocker can be a great tool for personal use, or in a very small business (under 15 users). But beyond that&#8230;beware of the boondoggle.</p>
<p><!--EndFragment--></p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/23/filesharing_crypto/">Anti-filesharing laws revive crypto fears for spooks</a> (theregister.co.uk)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><br />
</span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experiordata.com/blog/2009/11/19/to-bitlocker-or-to-not-bitlocker-thats-a-great-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
