Archive for December, 2009

Analysis of Privacy & Security in Meaningful Use rule

Thursday, December 31st, 2009

HHS Issues Interim Final Rule on Meaningful Use of Certified Electronic Health Records

On Wednesday, December 30th, the U.S Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released its Interim Final Rule on Meaningful use. This rule is applicable to covered entities who chose to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Essentially, healthcare providers must prove that they are using the EHRs and meet HHS’s standards of meaningful use in order to receive reimbursement for implementing the EHR system.

Stages

Stage 1 (starting in 2011):  Focused on electronically capturing health information, implementing clinical decision support tools to facilitate disease and medication management, and reporting clinical quality measures and public health information. Note that in this stage electronic protected health information (PHI) is being captured and stored, and as a result, must be secured. It is this specific information that must be protected from security breaches.


Stage 2 (starting in 2013): Focused on using captured information to improve care, electronic transmission of diagnostic test results, and computerized provider order entry (CPOE).


Stage 3 (starting in 2015): Focused on decision support and improvements in quality and safety.


Role of Security & Privacy in Meaningful Use

In general, HHS has specifically included encryption as a requirement for a Certified EHR system (only Certified EHR systems are eligible for cost reimbursement). The inclusion of encryption in meaningful use is indicative of the Federal government’s recognition that encryption is a critical technology in securing protected health information (PHI).


Certified EHRs must be able to provide the patient an electronic copy of their health information upon their request. This information must be provided within 96 hours from the time the provider obtains the information, such as lab results, for example. This patient information must secured with at least a symmetric 128 bit fixed-block cipher algorithm capable of using 128, 192, or 256 bit encryption key.


Certified EHRs must protect electronic health information by implementing controls and encyption, such as:

- Assigning a unique user name for each user

- Encrypt and decrypt health information for backups, removable media, etc.

- Event recording such as deletion of records

- Audit review log

- Systems to ensure health information has not been altered using a hash algorithm

- Record disclosures made for treatment

- Ensure identity management is in place

Systems outside of Certified EHRs

As a matter of policy HHS has decided NOT to dictate standards on privacy and security in the context of meaninful use for systems other than Certified EHRs. In other words, they acknowledge that there are other systems that are part of the electronic health IT ecosystem, such as backup systems, hard drives, removable media,  domain name systems (DNS), time servers (NNTP), etc. They acknowledge that these systems should be protected. However, for the purposes of the scope of the ruling they decided not to dictate standards or requirements beyond those for the actual EHR system.

Application of HIPAA Privacy and Security Rule

HHS took the time to reiterate that using a Certified EHR does not change existing HIPAA Privacy Rule or Security Rule requirements, guarantee compliance with those requirements, or absolve an eligible professional, eligible hospital, or other health care provider who adopts Certified EHR Technology from having to comply with any applicable provision of the HIPAA Privacy or Security Rules.


This essentially means that you must still consider the security of systems outside the Certified EHR system and, if necessary, secure these systems. Implementing a Certified EHR system does not absolve your organization from the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules. They go on further to say:


“While the capabilities provided by Certified EHR Technology may assist an eligible professional or eligible hospital in improving their technical safeguards in order to meet some or all of the HIPAA Security Rule’s requirements or influence their risk analysis, the use of Certified EHR Technology alone does not equate to compliance with the HIPAA Privacy or Security Rules.


Make sure you look at out healthcare IT system holistically. Implementing a Certified EHR is only part of the overall security equation in your organization.



Reblog this post [with Zemanta]













Security for Meaningful Use: Part 2 – Electronic Access to Protected Health Information (PHI)

Thursday, December 31st, 2009

Standards Set for Providing Secure Access to Patient Records


Sample patient record view from VistA Imaging
Image via Wikipedia

According to the Initial Set of Standards for Electronic Health Records patients must be provided with their health information (most certainly protected health information -PHI- under HIPAA) electronically and securely within 96 hours.


“Consistent with the HIT Policy Committee’s recommendations, we propose the following additional clarification of this objective. Electronic copies may be provided through a number of secure electronic methods (for example, personal health record (

PHR), patient portal, CD, USB drive).


Provide patients with timely electronic access to their health information (including lab results, problem list, medication lists, allergies) within 96 hours of the information being available to the EP. Also, consistent with the HIT Policy Committee recommendations, we propose the following additional clarification of this objective. Electronic access may be provided by a number of secure electronic methods (for example, PHR, patient portal, CD, USB drive). Timely is defined as within 96 hours of the information being available to the EP either through the receipt of final lab results or a patient interaction that updates the EP’s knowledge of the patient’s health. We judge 96 hours to be a reasonable amount of time to ensure that certified EHR technology is up to date. We welcome comment on if a shorter or longer time is advantageous.”

How to Secure Health Records

USB Vacuum Cleaner, a giveaway from an IBM event
Image via Wikipedia

You may be wondering how can patient information be secured. The best way to secure information is by encrypting the media. However, note that patients must be able to decrypt the information on their own computer equipment. One of the product Experior Data implements is called PGP Portable. For example, the patient provides a USB drive for you to copy the PHI onto it. PGP Portable encrypts the entire USB device after the information is copied to it. The patient must provide a passphrase during the encryption process. When the patient goes home he/she inserts the USB drive into their home computer and is prompted for the passphrase. After the passphrase is entered access to the patient information is provided.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]









Security for Meaningful Use: Part 1 – Web services

Thursday, December 31st, 2009
A graphical depiction of a very simple xml doc...
Image via Wikipedia

Web Services At Forefront


If you intend on implementing electronic records and apply for the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program (EHRIP) you must demonstrate “meaningful use” of the electronic health record system. One of the provisions in EHRIP is information sharing. The authors of the EHRIP specifically set out to standardize on two protocols for information sharing:

Both of these technologies are know as web services. Essentially, web services provide information sharing capabilities using structured data files called XML. The purpose is to use these open standards so that applications developed by different vendors could communicate and share information.


Securing Web Services


In terms of security it is important to ensure that the transmission between applications using these web services is properly encrypted using SSL technology. In addition, considerations should be made to implement network and host intrusion prevention systems to ensure the security and integrity of the systems transmitting the shared information. For example, accepting SOAP requests will require you to set  up a DMZ infrastructure. Servers sitting in the DMZ will need to accept SOAP requests and send them. It is the traffic to and from these servers, and the servers themselves, that need to be protected.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]









Regulation Bonanza – HHS releases two interim rules on 12/30/09

Thursday, December 31st, 2009
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services logo
Image via Wikipedia

With $20 billion at stake the Federal government released two interim rules:



The Electronic Health Record Incentive Program spells out the proposed terms of the the reimbursements healthcare professionals and certain entities can receive by implementing electronic health records.


The Initial Set of Standards rule discusses the concept of “meaningful use”, which is a major component of the incentive program. Healthcare entities must meet certain requirements, like sharing of information and being able to capture specific information from patients.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]


HHS Issues Interim Final Rule for definition of meaningful use

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

Today HHS came through with its promise to issue the interim final rule to define “meaningful use”. This is an important rule and will essentially spell out the terms and conditions of the forthcoming reimbursements for implementation of electronic health records.


A call is scheduled for 5:15pm on 12/30 to discuss the IFR.

WHEN: 
Today, Wednesday, Dec. 30, 2009, 5:15 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time

WHERE: 
Toll-Free Dial: (800) 837-1935
Conference ID: 49047605
Pass Code: HITECH

Oldie but Goodie – Nurses fired for posting photo of X-Ray

Tuesday, December 29th, 2009
Image representing Facebook as depicted in Cru...
Image via CrunchBase

Filed under “you just can’t make this stuff up” from our friends in Lake Geneva, Wisconsin:

‘ ‘There were two nurses that independently took a picture each of an X-ray of a patient,’ Walworth County Undersheriff Kurt Picknell said.
The patient was admitted to the emergency room with an object lodged in his rectum. Police said the nurse explained she and a co-worker snapped photos when they learned it was a sex device. Police said discussion about the incident was posted on her Facebook page, but they haven’t found anyone who actually saw the pictures.”

Well, contrary to common sense one has to wonder at what point do you say to yourself, “hey, I probably shouldn’t take a picture of an X-Ray belonging to a patient and post it on Facebook”. Although its not known if the X-Ray contained protected health information (PHI), we would venture to say that posting the X-Ray is probably not a good idea. I mean they could have encrypted it!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]


Happy Holidays from Experior Data

Thursday, December 24th, 2009
Try JibJab Sendables® eCards today!

Nurse from a Toronto health clinic loses USB drive with 83,000 patient records

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009
Toronto
Image via Wikipedia


Not a good day for our friends in Canada. Apparently, a nurse from a health clinic in a Toronto area clinic copied health information for 83,000 people to a USB drive..and subsequently lost the drive. Not good.


A health department nurse was taking a USB key containing the records to her car in Whitby, Ont., to take it to a remote clinic site on Dec. 15 when the device was lost. A search failed to turn it up.

“We believe it was lost on regional property. We have some video surveillance tape data to indicate that was the case,” said Dr. Robert Kyle, chief medical officer of health for Durham Region.

The privacy commission office was advised Monday by the Durham Region health department that the device was missing, said spokesman Bob Spence.

The USB key contained the names, addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth and health card numbers of patients who attended H1N1 flu vaccination clinics in the region between Oct. 23 and Dec. 15.”

View the full The Canadian Press article

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Even Dilbert is serious about data encryption

Thursday, December 17th, 2009

Dilbert.com

Health Net Breach Notification Letter

Monday, December 14th, 2009
{{pt|A cantora canadense Alanis Morissette dur...
Image via Wikipedia
Health Net, Inc.
Image via Wikipedia

As Alanis Morrissette would say “And isn’t it ironic … don’t you think”. A relative just received a breach notification letter from from Health Net.

Some wording we find interesting:


“The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a matter involving an unencrypted portable computer disk drive was discovered missing from a Health Net office”.



What’s interesting about this sentence is that they use the term “unencrypted”. So the majority of the general public does not know what this term means. However, Health Net indirectly acknowledges that the drive should have been encrypted, and perhaps they will implement encryption in their company.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]